Is this the Route to ‘Viksit Bharat’?: Kapil Sibal Questions UP Kanwar Yatra Order Amid Controversy
The controversy over religious processions and public safety for Kanwar Yatra has again come to the forefront in India, especially Uttar Pradesh. Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal expressed grave concern over the Uttar Pradesh government allowing the Kanwar Yatra amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
One such annual pilgrimage is the Kanwar Yatra, wherein the devotees of Lord Shiva, called Kanwariyas, trek to the holy places, Haridwar, to fetch water from River Ganges. It ranks among the biggest congregation of religious places in Northern India, attracting millions from many states.
Fearing a third wave of COVID-19 and the spread of the Delta variant, the Government of Uttar Pradesh had earlier decided to cancel Kanwar Yatra, keeping public health in mind. In a surprising turn of events, the government rolled back the decision and announced that the Yatra would be conducted with some restrictions.
The move, of course, is controversial and has attracted criticism from various quarters, including health experts and political leaders. Kapil Sibal of Congress expressed shock over how the Uttar Pradesh government was handling the situation on social media. He asked whether permitting the Kanwar Yatra amidst a pandemic fitted the vision of ‘Viksit Bharat’ the nation aspires to achieve.
The concerns that Sibal raised find an echo in other apprehensions about the fine line that treads between religious sentiments and public health imperatives during a raging pandemic. While the Kanwar Yatra enjoys a special place in the hearts of devotees, it represents a great number of logistical and health challenges, from sheer scale of this exodus to large gathering turning into super-spreader events.
He termed the government decisions inconsistent over public gatherings and alleged that strict COVID-19 restrictions have been imposed against all other activities but not in the Kanwar Yatra. It is necessary to follow one way in pandemics management riddled with scientific advice and public health guidelines totally juxtaposed over political considerations, he emphasizes.
It is this balancing act between freedoms of religion, public health, and duties of governance that has played out in the Kanwar Yatra controversy. On one hand, religious processions and congregations are an integral part of culture and faith for millions of Indians; on the other, with the resurgence of variants and superspreader events known to drive up transmission rates, there are very real risks right now.
Thus, critics jumped in, guns blazing, saying that the decision for the Kanwar Yatra reflects a prioritization of political appeasement at the cost of public health prudence. Opponents pointed out the possible fallout from such mass gatherings at times of a pandemic by citing multiple previous instances in which religious events across the country have been linked to COVID-19 case spikes.
These Yatra supporters bring in the case of religious freedom and traditions on the platform of respect for the cultural practices that have been of age-old importance to communities. In this context, they hold the contention that with proper safety measures in place, such as mandatory COVID-19 testing, wearing masks, and social distancing, the Yatra can proceed in a responsible way without posing a threat to public health.
The debate reopened another element of accountability and transparency that should characterize governance decisions in the context of public health emergencies. Critics believe that political convenience should never be allowed to override evidence-based policymaking that is guided by expert advice and epidemiological data.
Among the array of questionable issues, one expects political leaders, such as Kapil Sibal, to raise the relevant questions and plead for strong public health measures. The criticism by Sibal followed wider concerns of Opposition parties and sections of civil society over the handling of the pandemic and the requirement of cohesive national strategies to fight the virus effectively.
This would be a gigantic task for the Uttar Pradesh government to make sure, ahead, that the Kanwar Yatra proceeds safely, mitigating the transmission of COVID-19. The putting in place of effective health protocols, adequate preparedness of healthcare infrastructure, and proactive monitoring of cases were things that would avoid potential outbreaks linked with the Yatra.
The Kanwar Yatra episode thus serves as a grim reminder of the delicate balancing act between religious freedoms and public health imperatives in a country as diverse and plural as India. It definitely requires nuance in policymaking to respect cultural diversity while keeping public health safe amidst new global health challenges.
Thus, when Kapil Sibal questions the Uttar Pradesh government for permitting Kanwar Yatra during a raging pandemic, it may not be an accusation alone; rather, it has wider ramifications that carry into administration, public health, and protection to religious freedoms. It has firmly underlined how handling religious processions at such junctures of crisis to health comes with certain complexities and responsibilities that bring along critical reflections en route to that ‘Viksit Bharat’ that ensures development with public welfare.
Read more about related article, just click here
